Asked  7 Months ago    Answers:  5   Viewed   36 times

I appeared for php test, their I was asked one question for which I could not find the answer.

The question is like this.

echo "MESSI is injured!!";

Interviewer want both header and echo to be written on the same page.

I wonder how's it possible.It should give some error like

headers already sent by (output started at .....

Is it really possible to write echo and header onto same page !!!



You can use Output Buffering as

echo "MESSI is injured!!";

The problem is that we cannot send the header after we start sending the output. To solve this we buffer the output. The function ob_start turns output buffering on. While output buffering is active no output is sent from the script (other than headers), instead the output is stored in an internal buffer. So the echo output will be buffered. Next we send the header without any problem as we've not yet spit out any output. Finally we call ob_end_flush to flush the internal buffer contents and to stop output buffering.

Wednesday, March 31, 2021
answered 7 Months ago

Checking the engine source for headers_list and http_response_code, notice that the value for general headers and status code are separated:

// headers_list

// http_response_code

But HTTP response code isn't the only header with dedicated storage: Content-Type does, too:

SG(sapi_headers).mimetype = NULL;

So what's going on here? The complete header() algorithm specifically checks for the following strings to adjust state:

  • HTTP/
  • Content-Type
  • Content-Length
  • Location
  • WWW-Authenticate

HTTP/ is checked specifically because that's how one set the status code explicitly before PHP 5.4: after that, http_response_code is available and is recommended for clarity. That header() was used is confusing, for the reason you're asking in this question and on general principle: the http header BNF clearly doesn't include status line:

header-field   = field-name ":" OWS field-value OWS

PHP handles the others separately because they are single-value headers and/or their value matters for efficiency in later calculations.

TL;DR: HTTP/ set by header() isn't included in headers_list() because HTTP/ status lines are not headers in the strict RFC sense. But for the PHP < 5.4 limitation that header() was the only way to set HTTP/ status, it'd likely have never been a confusing issue.

Wednesday, March 31, 2021
answered 7 Months ago

Do something like

header("Location: index.php?Message=" . urlencode($Message));

Then on index.php...

if (isset($_GET['Message'])) {
    print $_GET['Message'];

In other words, index.php will always check if it's being passed a message in the url. If there is one, display it. Then, just pass the message in the redirect

if you really want to use a modal popup, generate the js...

if (isset($_GET['Message'])) {
    print '<script type="text/javascript">alert("' . $_GET['Message'] . '");</script>';

Note that this will break if you use quotes in the message unless you escape them

Thursday, August 12, 2021
answered 3 Months ago

As of Scala 2.11.7, the answer is no. However, there is SIP-24, so in some future version your f: => T* version may be possible.

Saturday, August 28, 2021
answered 2 Months ago

If you give a person a fish, they eat for a day. If you teach a person to fish...

My measures for the quality of an implementation are:

  • Correctness: If you aren't getting the right answer in all cases, then it isn't ready
  • Readability/maintainability: Look at code repetition, understandable names, the number of lines of code per block/method (and the number of things each block does), and how difficult it is to trace the flow of your code. Look at any number of books focused on refactoring, programming best-practices, coding standards, etc, if you want more information on this.
  • Theoretical performance (worst-case and ammortized): Big-O is a metric you can use. CPU and memory consumption should both be measured
  • Complexity: Estimate how it would take an average professional programmer to implement (if they already know the algorithm). See if that is in line with how difficult the problem actually is

As for your implementation:

  • Correctness: I suggest writing unit tests to determine this for yourself and/or debugging it (on paper) from start to finish with interesting sample/edge cases. Null, one item, two items, various numbers of duplicates, etc
  • Readability/maintainability: It looks mostly fine, though your last two comments don't add anything. It is a bit more obvious what your code does than the code in the book
  • Performance: I believe both are N-squared. Whether the amortized cost is lower on one or the other I'll let you figure out :)
  • Time to implement: An average professional should be able to code this algorithm in their sleep, so looking good
Sunday, September 5, 2021
answered 2 Months ago
Only authorized users can answer the question. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged :